Copilot Playbook
Cowork/The 40-Minute Cowork Session
Updated August 27, 2026
Partner Field Guide · Cowork

The 40-Minute Cowork Session

Your complete guide — the conversation, the tools, the licensing, and what comes next.

For partners running the Cowork conversation · Customer Zero: Copilot Practice Builder Workshop

Do not sell Cowork. Sell the management of Cowork.

Forty minutes is exactly enough time to make that sentence stick — if you leave with the lineup in your head, the reframe on your tongue, a real number on paper, and a named customer on your index card.

0. The Conversation Map

Before the minute-by-minute detail, see the whole shape at once: seven beats inside the 40 minutes, then the branch you should be walking toward the moment you finish. Nothing below is optional filler — every box on this map gets its own fully-scripted stop in Section 4, and the branch at the right gets its own roadmap in Section 11.

TOTAL RUNTIME — 40 MINUTES 1 Provocation 2 The 3 Surfaces 3 Shadow AI Wedge 4 Same Model Reframe 5 The Cost Story 6 The SOW Menu 7 30-Day Contract WHAT'S NEXT — THE ARR LADDER Assessment → AUP → Managed Governance → Insurance Readiness → vCISO Retainer — training runs under every rung See Section 11 for the full roadmap & pricing

Figure 0 — Beats 1–3 (teal) place Cowork on the map and open the governance wedge. Beats 4–5 (dark teal) survive the two objections that actually kill deals. Beats 6–7 (purple) convert the sale into a named next step — which is also where the session hands off into the six-rung ARR ladder that runs for months afterward.

↑ Back to Table of Contents

1. Purpose & Outcomes

Forty minutes is not enough time to teach Cowork. It's enough time to give you the four moves you need to have the conversation — and this design is built around exactly those four, in order. This guide picks up exactly where the Shadow AI discovery conversation leaves off: your customer has a Copilot license, or is about to, and now you have to decide what to say about Cowork.

By the end, you can

(a) explain Cowork's place in the customer conversation without a demo, (b) run the co-sell talk track against a Claude or ChatGPT preference, (c) size Cowork consumption for a customer's monthly bill on paper, and (d) name the two follow-on SOWs you'll pursue after any Cowork sale.

Everything below is a building block, deliberately. Each stop in Section 4 is independently reusable in a one-on-one customer meeting, a lunch-and-learn, or a QBR — if you only retain Stop 4 (the reframe) or Stop 5 (the cost story), you still walk out able to run half the conversation.

↑ Back to Table of Contents

2. Before You Walk In — the Tools You'll Actually Use

This conversation is deliberately low-tech in delivery — no live tenant, no login risk — but it leans on four real tools you'll use live, not just cite afterward. Know each one cold before you walk in.

Copilot Credit EstimatorUsed in Stop 5

Microsoft's official interactive credit-forecasting tool. Enter agent type, licensing option, and expected feature usage; it returns a monthly Copilot Credit range. This is the tool of record — the Cowork Cost Simulator below is the co-branded, offline version of the same math.

You feed itPersona mix, light/medium/heavy task counts, model choice
It returnsA monthly credit range and a $ estimate at $0.01/credit
Open the Copilot Credit Estimator
Cowork Cost SimulatorUsed live in Stop 5

The browser-based, offline, PDF-exportable partner tool — your go-to for the live moment. It runs as a guided interview: one question per screen, with the words to say sitting beside every field, and the full output held back until the end so the customer answers before they see a number. Same math as the Credit Estimator, aligned to Microsoft's published task-mix defaults, but built to print a co-branded leave-behind on the spot.

You feed itA named account's headcount, its real Copilot license inventory, how many would actually turn Cowork on, the persona shape, and the governance posture
It returnsA cost range with its arithmetic on show, a PayGo-vs-P3 comparison, a licensing recommendation that explains its own reasoning, the readiness flags, and the talk track to run next
Open the Cowork Cost & Conversation Simulator
License Uplift CalculatorReferenced in Stop 6 / Section 6

Three-column comparison — Business Premium alone, Business Premium + Defender Suite + Purview Suite, and E5 — with a line-by-line capability delta. Proves the SMB-native path (BP + Suites) covers what most Cowork rollouts need without an E5 forklift.

You feed itCurrent SKU, seat count, target governance capabilities
It returnsA per-capability ✓ / partial / ✗ grid and a $/user/month delta
This now ships inside the Cowork Cost & Conversation Simulator above — its Licensing Recommendation panel prices all seven paths side by side and marks which governance gaps each one closes, driven by the readiness answers you give it. Section 6's licensing snapshot stays the static reference.
ASPX (AI Business Solutions & Security Partner Experience)Used before the session — see Stop 1

The partner-facing propensity portal. Weekly-refreshed, per-tenant Copilot and Cowork signals — this is where your named account for the closing exercise should come from, not a guess.

You feed itNothing — it's already populated per tenant you administer
It returnsFree Copilot MAU, Data Security Maturity, Usage Limits, Cowork MAU
Open ASPX

Your materials checklist

Keep in your pocket

If you haven't run the Shadow AI discovery conversation with this account yet, spend thirty extra seconds on the one sentence that connects the two: “Cowork grounds in your customer's M365 data through Work IQ, and it honors whatever Purview labels are already there. Ungoverned data in, unreliable output out — at the same credit cost.”

↑ Back to Table of Contents

3. The Shape of the Session

Three acts in forty minutes — each one a building block you can redeploy on its own. The pacing is intentionally front-loaded on objection handling because that's where deals actually die: not in the pitch, in the second question from the CFO or the CIO who already has a Claude subscription.

1
Place it on the map
Stops 1–3 · Min 0–18

Where Cowork sits relative to Copilot Chat and the M365 Copilot seat, and why the Shadow AI conversation had to come first. No pitch yet — just the mental model the rest of the session hangs from.

2
Survive the two objections that kill the deal
Stops 4–5 · Min 18–32

“We already use Claude” and “this is going to cost a fortune.” Both get a reframe and a number, not a slogan.

3
Turn it into pipeline
Stops 6–7 · Min 32–40

Not a wrap-up — a commitment. You leave with a named account, a booked call, and the two SOWs you'll pitch next.

↑ Back to Table of Contents

4. The Conversation, Beat by Beat

Every stop below has the same three-part anatomy: what you say (the talk track), what you show (the visual or comparison), and the segue — the exact line that pulls the conversation into the next stop. Read it top to bottom once before your first live run; after that, the segues alone are enough to keep you on track.

1

Opening Provocation

0:00–0:04

This is a brand-new opportunity — the customer isn't running Cowork yet. So don't open with someone else's usage report; open with the question that actually got you in the room.

What you say
Pick whichever of these already sounds like the meeting you're walking into — one of the three almost always fits.
“Don't we already have this with Claude?”

Their team already runs Claude — sanctioned or shadow — and someone just spotted “Cowork” surface inside Microsoft 365 Copilot.

You say“Fair question, and it's exactly the one this conversation answers. Same-caliber model, different governance. Let's talk about what changes when it runs inside your Microsoft 365 tenant instead of a personal subscription.”
“We saw this demoed at a conference and want it.”

An exec or your IT lead sat through a Cowork demo at an industry event or a Microsoft partner conference, walked away excited, and wants it running before anyone's checked the cost or whether their data's ready.

You say“Love that energy — let's turn it into a plan instead of a rush. Cowork bills differently than the seat you're used to, and turning it on before your data's ready just means you pay full price for output nobody trusts.”
“One person tried it and now leadership wants everyone on it.”

An early adopter ran a Cowork task, it impressed a VP, and now there's executive pressure to roll it out with no plan for cost or governance.

You say“That's the best kind of pressure to have — but ‘give everyone access’ is how a $30 seat turns into a runaway bill overnight. Let's build the rollout that keeps the magic and controls the meter.”
What you show
Nothing borrowed — the prospect's own numbers. If you already ran the Shadow AI discovery conversation with this account, this is where its findings earn their keep: pull up their Free Copilot MAU and Users Experiencing Usage Limits from ASPX, or the ChatGPT/Claude usage Defender for Cloud Apps already discovered. The point isn't a scary stat — it's proving you're talking about their tenant, not a generic pitch.
Segue: “Whichever one of those just described your meeting — the next thirty-six minutes gives you the same four moves. So before we talk about what Cowork does, let's agree on where it sits — because pitching it like a bigger Copilot Chat is the fastest way to lose the thread.”
2

The Copilot vs. Cowork Model

0:04–0:12
What you say
Three surfaces, spoken in order, each with one sentence of “what it costs” and one of “what it's for.” Land Microsoft's own framing verbatim — partners can repeat it without softening it.
SurfaceWhat it isBuying motion
Copilot ChatFast, grounded, single-conversation work — draft, summarize, askIncluded in the M365 Copilot seat
M365 CopilotCopilot inside Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Outlook, TeamsFixed per-user/month via CSP — the ARR anchor
Copilot CoworkAgentic execution of long-running, multi-step work — returns a completed result, not a draftUsage-based, Copilot Credits, PayGo or pre-purchase
Cowork “executes complex, long-running, multi-tool tasks… and returns a completed result, not just a draft or a recommendation.”— Charles Lamanna, Microsoft 365 Blog, GA announcement, June 16, 2026
Segue: “That third row is the one your customer's data has to be ready for. Which is exactly why this isn't the first Cowork conversation you have — it's the second.”
3

The Shadow AI Wedge

0:12–0:18
What you say
One sentence, said slowly: “Governance readiness is consumption readiness.” Cowork grounds in Microsoft 365 data through Work IQ and honors Purview sensitivity labels — a poorly governed estate yields unreliable Cowork output at the same credit cost. If you already ran the Shadow AI discovery conversation with this account, this is a callback: “Remember the oversharing finding from this morning — three ‘Confidential’ sites shared with everyone? Cowork will happily pull from those the same way Copilot Chat would. The credits get spent either way; only the output quality changes.”
What you show
The Purview support snapshot — what Cowork governs today vs. not yet, so you don't overclaim:
Supported today

Sensitivity label inheritance on outputs · audit logging of prompts/responses · eDiscovery on Cowork content · Data Lifecycle Management & retention · Communication Compliance policies

Not yet — say this honestly

DLP specific to Cowork (Microsoft lists it “coming soon”) · Cowork interactions in the Apps & Agents dashboard · Cowork interactions in the AI observability page

Segue: “Now — the objection you're all thinking about, because every one of your customers already has an AI subscription that isn't Microsoft's.”
4

“Same Model, Different Governance”

0:18–0:26

The highest-leverage eight minutes in the session.

What you say
Say the line, then justify it, then drill it once with a colleague if you have time to rehearse (full drill in Section 9).
“Keep Claude. Bring it under management. Cowork is what runs the work your Microsoft 365 tenant already knows about.”The line to use three times per Cowork conversation
What you show
Two facts to keep straight, so you don't over-promise on model quality:
The two facts

The underlying model is the same family — Copilot Cowork runs Anthropic Opus 4.8 and Sonnet 4.6 at GA, with GPT 5.5 in Frontier and a lower-cost Cowork 1 model coming. Don't argue “our model is better” — you'll lose that argument. Instead: Microsoft's own disclosed internal testing showed Copilot Cowork averaging 30–40% cheaper per prompt than Claude Cowork with its Microsoft 365 connector, on the same model, same tasks (125 runs, 12 prompts, both on Opus 4.8, June 2026).

Personal Claude / ChatGPT subscription

Outside the trust boundary. No Purview labels, no Defender for Cloud Apps visibility, no Cost Management, no Entra identity binding. The model may be excellent — the operations around it don't exist.

Copilot Cowork

Inside the Microsoft 365 trust boundary. Purview, Defender for Cloud Apps, Entra, and Cost Management all apply automatically. Don't out-argue model quality — out-argue enterprise operations.

Want the full dimension-by-dimension teardown (billing, regional constraints, partner monetization)? That's Section 5 — keep it in your back pocket for the CIO who wants receipts.

Segue: “Now that you've kept the account instead of losing it to ‘we already have AI’ — let's make sure the number on the invoice doesn't lose it for you six weeks later.”
5

The Customer Cost Story

0:26–0:32
2.6×
For an actively engaged user, Cowork credit consumption runs at roughly 2.6× the cost of the underlying Microsoft 365 Copilot license itself. Cowork is not an add-on line item — it is the larger line item.
What you open
The Cowork Cost Simulator, live. Pull your named account's rough headcount and a guess at light/medium/heavy task mix, then run the number on the spot — the point isn't precision, it's proving the exercise takes ninety seconds and produces a printable page. If it helps to show what "governed" looks like once they're actually live, this is where the month-one Cost Management screenshot from your prep folder (§2) earns its keep — not as a warning, as a preview of the dashboard they'll own.
WORKED EXAMPLE — the math behind the tool, using Microsoft's disclosed default task-mix patterns
PersonaLight tasks/moMediumHeavyCredits/user/moEst. $/user/mo
Corporate Knowledge Worker2211514,250$142.50
Customer-Facing1713514,625$146.25
Technical1291422,800$228.00
Manager / Senior Leader13638,225$82.25
Formula: credits/user = (Light×125) + (Medium×500) + (Heavy×1,200), billed at $0.01/credit. Role mixes are Microsoft's Frontier-observed defaults — all editable in the room via the Simulator. Your account's real mix is what you plug in live; this table is the arithmetic underneath the tool, not a substitute for running it.
Segue: “You now have a number the customer will want managed. That management is the actual sale — let's name what you're selling.”
6

The Follow-On SOWs

0:32–0:38
What you say
Cowork itself is rarely the revenue — the ladder rungs it opens are. Name exactly two as mandatory; the rest are optional add-ons scaled to the account. (The full six-rung ARR ladder that starts here is Section 11 — this is the two rungs that come immediately off a Cowork sale.)
M1
Managed AI Governance retainer
Mandatory · $4–$8/seat/mo

Monthly Cost Management + Cowork Usage review, spending-policy tuning, per-user limit adjustment, concentration-risk check. The recurring hinge of the whole ladder.

M2
Oversharing Remediation
Mandatory · $8K–$18K fixed fee

The SharePoint/Teams cleanup that makes Cowork's grounding trustworthy in the first place — priced as its own line, not folded into the license quote.

O
AUP authoring · sanctioned-app onboarding · vCISO retainer
Optional, sized to the account

AI Acceptable Use Policy authoring ($1K–$5K), sanctioned third-party AI onboarding under Entra SSO ($3,500–$5,000/app), and a vCISO retainer for regulated verticals ($2,600–$15K/mo).

Segue: “That's the whole conversation, compressed. The only thing left is making sure you actually run it this month, not someday.”
7

The 30-Day Contract

0:38–0:40
What you do
No slide — just an index card. Write down the customer's name, the date of your first call, and the one sentence you'll open with. Say it out loud — to a colleague, your manager, whoever's around — public commitment is the point, not the paperwork.
Segue into what's next: the call you just booked is the opening move of Section 11's ARR ladder — the assessment, the AUP, and the governance retainer all trace back to this one index card.
↑ Back to Table of Contents

5. The Deep Claude Cowork Comparison — for When You Get Pushback

Stop 4 gives you the reframe. This section is what's behind it — pull it out when a colleague, or a customer later, wants the full dimension-by-dimension teardown.

DimensionMicrosoft Copilot CoworkClaude Cowork (Anthropic)
ModelOpus 4.8 & Sonnet 4.6 at GA, GPT 5.5 in FrontierAnthropic Claude models
DeploymentCloud, integrated with M365 tenantDesktop (macOS/Windows/Linux) + web + mobile
PrerequisiteM365 Copilot USL (~$30/user/mo) + usageClaude Pro at ~$17/mo (annual)
Effective monthly cost$30 license + variable usage — typically higher for active users$17 (Pro) — agentic use may push toward Max
Data groundingWork IQ — automatic across email, meetings, files, chats, peopleExplicit per-task connection; M365 connector available
GovernancePurview (DSPM, labels, audit, eDiscovery, IRM, DLM, Comm Compliance); Defender for Cloud Apps; EntraSOC 2 II, ISO 27001/42001, HIPAA; Cowork activity not yet in audit logs per Anthropic
Cost controlsSpending policies at tenant/group/user; alert thresholds; PayGo or P3Flat subscription; no partner-managed spend controls
BillingCopilot Credits via Azure/CSP; PayGo $0.01/credit or P3 discountDirect subscription with Anthropic
Partner monetizationRecurring CSP margin + governance retainer + adoption + AgentOpsOne-time implementation; no CSP resale; no tenant to manage
Regional constraintsEU/EFTA/UK/gov-cloud tenants face Anthropic sub-processor constraints; gov cloud blockedBroader macOS/Linux support, but no M365-native controls

Rehearsed objection handles

“Claude is a better model.”

Same model family under both. Cowork's edge isn't the model — it's what wraps it: governance, cost controls, and a tenant you already manage.

“Claude Cowork is cheaper.”

Microsoft's disclosed internal testing showed Copilot Cowork 30–40% cheaper per prompt on the same model, same tasks. Offer to run the comparison live.

“We just want the desktop app.”

Fine for one person. Ask who manages spend, audits prompts, and enforces DLP across the team — that's the tenant story only Copilot Cowork has.

“Anthropic has SOC 2 / ISO certs too.”

True — but Cowork activity isn't yet captured in Anthropic's own audit logs or Compliance API. Purview captures it today, inside your existing estate.

“It's simpler — one subscription.”

Simpler until spend needs a cap, an owner, or an auditor. That's exactly the governance retainer the partner is built to run.

Where you must not overstate

Don't claim Cowork is universally cheaper — the 30–40% figure is specific to Microsoft's tested prompt set.

Don't claim DLP is available for Cowork today — it's “coming soon.”

Don't claim Cowork appears in every Purview surface today — Apps & Agents and AI observability don't show it yet.

Don't sell Cowork into EU/EFTA/UK/gov-cloud tenants without checking Anthropic sub-processor status.

Don't sell Cowork before the customer has a CSP-channel Azure subscription — they'll hit the billing wall.

↑ Back to Table of Contents

6. The Licensing Snapshot — What to Quote Without Blinking

Stop 6's objection “we don't own Purview or Defender for Cloud Apps” only lands cleanly if you have the current SMB licensing math memorized. Here it is.

$22
Business Premium, per user/month, paid yearly (2026 pricing)
~$15
Combined Defender + Purview Suite add-on for Business Premium, per user/month — the E5-capability unlock without the E5 forklift
50%
Promotional discount on Purview Suite when purchased alongside Microsoft 365 Copilot
Wrong pitch
“You need to upgrade to E5.”

Business Premium customers hear this as “double my Microsoft bill” — deal stalls.

Right pitch
Same Copilot engine, right stack

“The Copilot AI engine is identical on Business Premium and E5” — Microsoft states this plainly. The difference is the governance stack in the base SKU, not the Copilot feature set.

SMB-native path
BP + Copilot + Purview Suite

Business Premium + Copilot + Purview Suite add-on + optional Defender Suite add-on. Same Copilot experience, right governance stack, no E5 forklift.

Verify before quoting
The DSPM for AI catch

DSPM for AI ships in the Purview Suite for Business Premium add-on for third-party AI monitoring, but full Copilot data assessments may still require E5 Compliance in some configurations. Confirm against current licensing tables before quoting.

This is exactly what the License Uplift Calculator (§2) is built to walk a customer through line by line — three columns (BP alone / BP + Suites / E5), each Shadow AI capability marked ✓ / partial / ✗, so nobody has to take the delta on faith.

↑ Back to Table of Contents

7. Objection Vault — What You'll Hear Every Week

ObjectionThe reframeThe evidence
“Our staff isn't using AI.”The bet is on you naming exactly how many are — before an audit does. Most AI-using employees are on personal, unmanaged accounts.Free Copilot MAU from ASPX + a 14-day Defender for Cloud Apps scan closes this in three weeks
“We already use Claude — why Cowork?”Same-caliber model, different governance, different grounding, different identity boundary. Keep Claude. Add Cowork.Stop 4 script · §5 deep comparison
“Copilot is too expensive.”You're already paying for AI — it's just not on your P&L. Employees are on personal subscriptions today. Governance is the difference between exposure and asset.Independent unmanaged-AI exposure research (§13)
“Cowork credits are unpredictable.”Set caps and per-user alerts before the pilot. Month one gives you the baseline; treat it as an operating discipline, not a surprise bill.The month-one admin field report (§13)
“We'll just block ChatGPT and Claude.”Don't. Blocking without sanctioning drives Shadow AI further underground — to personal devices you can't see at all. Sanction one or two, monitor the rest.The two-layer governance model (§13)
“We don't own Purview / Defender for Cloud Apps.”The Business Premium Defender + Purview Suite add-ons close the gap at a fraction of E5 cost, discounted alongside a Copilot purchase.Section 6 licensing snapshot
↑ Back to Table of Contents

8. The Eight Discovery Questions You Walk In With

These are the bridge from this conversation to your first customer call. Better still: don't start from a blank slate. Pull your top account through ASPX first (§2) so Question 8 already has a data point behind it before the customer even answers.

  1. Which AI tools does the leadership team know your staff is using?
  2. Which AI tools does your staff actually use? (It's more than the answer to Q1.)
  3. What data classification standard exists today — what labels, and who owns them?
  4. Do you have an AI Acceptable Use Policy? When was it last reviewed?
  5. Is there an approved Copilot budget, and is Cowork line-itemed separately from it?
  6. What's your cyber insurance renewal date — does the questionnaire ask about AI use?
  7. What does your SharePoint estate look like — Copilot-ready, or an oversharing risk?
  8. If you named your top three AI use cases, what would they be? (The Cowork positioning wedge — chat can't do them; Cowork can.)
↑ Back to Table of Contents

9. If You Have 90 Minutes Instead of 40

The forty-minute design is deliberately spare. When the agenda allows a longer block, these five exercises turn the same building blocks into hands-on practice.

  1. Simulate your own customer. Open the Cost Simulator (§2), enter a real target account's persona mix, model a pre-purchase discount, and print a co-branded leave-behind.
  2. Design your Cowork monthly retainer. Scorecard, artifacts, cadence, price point for a 25-seat customer — talk it through with a colleague or your manager.
  3. The billing-wall drill. Have a colleague play the customer's CFO while you walk the Azure plan purchase and Cost Management activation from memory.
  4. The Claude objection drill. Pair up: one of you plays a CIO who prefers Claude Cowork, the other reframes using Stop 4's script and the §5 deep comparison. Two rounds each, then switch.
  5. The month-one review dry run. Using a sample tenant's numbers, draft your month-two recommendation, then have a peer tear it apart.
↑ Back to Table of Contents

10. Keep Your Delivery Sharp

↑ Back to Table of Contents

11. What's Next — the Path After Minute 40

The index card from Stop 7 is the first rung of a ladder, not a one-off sale. Six service lines compound off the same 4-week discovery engagement that starts with the call you just booked — training runs underneath every rung as the recurring evidence layer that keeps audit and insurance renewals painless.

1
Shadow AI Assessment
The land. One-time, fixed fee. Discovery scan on a real tenant, then convert on specificity: “Here are the 14 AI tools your staff used last month, and here is the client data that left your environment.”
$1.5K–$7.5K
2
AI Acceptable Use Policy (AUP)
Sold immediately after the assessment. “You have a policy for passwords and remote access; you have none for the fastest-spreading tool in your business.” Never sell a policy without an enforcement plan attached.
$1K–$5K
3
Managed AI Governance — THE RECURRING HINGE
Ongoing enforcement, policy cascade, prompt DLP/redaction, blocking of unsanctioned tools, monthly usage/risk reporting. “Your AUP is only a document until something enforces it.”
$2–$8/seat/mo
4
Insurance / Compliance Readiness
Hybrid sprint + recurring. “If your application asks whether employees share data with AI systems, right now the honest answer is ‘we don't know.’ Here's how we get you an answer you can support.”
$2.5K–$10K sprint
5
vCISO / Compliance Advisory Retainer
For 50–1,000 employee firms that need security leadership but can't justify a full-time CISO. Share of MSPs offering vCISO more than tripled year-over-year; 50%+ of assessment clients convert.
$2.6K–$15K/mo
6
Client Training & Enablement — runs under every rung
Short role-based modules on what not to paste into public AI tools, with completion tracking. “Training completion records are exactly what your insurer and auditor ask for.”
$2–$5/user/mo
The three revenue shapes to keep in your head

Every dollar on this ladder sits in one of three buckets: Project/SOW (Rungs 1, 2, 4), Managed Governance/AgentOps (Rungs 3, 6), or Outcome-Based (Rung 5). Naming them once keeps the ladder legible and stops partners from accidentally price-anchoring on hourly billing.

And specifically for Cowork accounts — the admin motion that earns the retainer

Once a customer is live on Cowork, the Managed AI Governance retainer (Rung 3) has concrete monthly work behind it — pulled straight from the field-tested Cowork admin playbook:

Admin viewBest forDate behaviorRefresh behavior
Copilot → Cost ManagementCredits, limits, policies, users/groups, agents/services, prepaid vs. PayGoSupports an exact calendar monthOverview every 4 hrs; Consumption every 2 hrs
Copilot → Cowork → UsageActive users, tasks, scheduled vs. user-initiated, retention, adoptionRolling 7/28/90/180 days; default 28Check the visible “Last updated” timestamp

The monthly scorecard you should ship on that retainer: Cowork Credits used (exact calendar month), active users and sessions, median/top-5 concentration, % tasks scheduled vs. user-initiated, retained users week-over-week, and users at ≥50%/≥80% of their limit as the early-warning list.

↑ Back to Table of Contents

12. The Walk-Out Artifact and the 30/60/90

In hand at 0:40

1
Index card — customer name, call date, opening line
8
Discovery-question card (§8)
6
Objection-handling table (§7), printable as a one-pager
1
Live Cost Simulator estimate for a named account, if run in Stop 5

The follow-on 30/60/90

HorizonPartner motion
Day 30First call made on the named account; Azure plan live on at least one customer tenant; Cost Management review scheduled.
Day 60First Managed AI Governance retainer sold; oversharing remediation scoped or completed on the pilot customer.
Day 90The retainer motion repeatable across three or more accounts; seller team drilled on the Claude objection; practice revenue reported against the base-case model.
↑ Back to Table of Contents

13. Reference Library

Every figure, quote, and talk track in this guide traces to one of the sources below. Cite these by name when someone pushes back — the credibility is earned, not asserted.

Microsoft official — canonical
Charles Lamanna, Microsoft 365 Blog, June 16, 2026 — GA announcement, pricing model, the “completed result” line
Microsoft Learn — access, discoverability, admin controls
Microsoft Learn — the definitive Cost Management reference behind Stop 5
Microsoft's official interactive credit-forecasting tool
Microsoft Learn — the four-step Discover / Block / Protect / Govern model
Microsoft's own comparison page — background for §5
MVP & community field references
Microsoft MVP; the “Copilot Cowork First Month” write-up is the source of the credit/user/scheduled-task figures in Stop 1 and the admin playbook in §11
Nikki Chapple, Microsoft MVP — the “control the apps / control the data” model behind “sanction, don't block”
Nikki Chapple — endpoint DLP in the browser tab
Tenant Wizards (Danny Vorst)
Tom Arbuthnot's Microsoft 365 AI Workplace Updates
Ken Young, Microsoft — the “delay is risk displacement” framing
Publishing note

This guide is designed to stand alone as a downloadable resource on copilotplaybook.com, cross-linked to its companion documents so the credibility chain — Microsoft official, named MVP, internal playbook — stays visible to any partner who opens it cold.

↑ Back to Table of Contents