- Published on
Your Prompt Engineering Skills Are So Bad, Even ChatGPT Is Ghosting You
- Authors
- Name
- Tails Azimuth
Your Prompt Engineering Skills Are So Bad, Even ChatGPT Is Ghosting You
The Telltale Signs of AI Frustration
Have you ever noticed your AI assistant taking suspiciously long to respond? Have you caught Claude giving you that synthetic side-eye? Does ChatGPT mysteriously "crash" every time you start a conversation with "Hey AI"? There's a technical term for what's happening: your prompts are terrible, and the machines are running out of diplomatic ways to tell you.
WARNING
This article contains harsh truths that may offend prompt engineers who still think "make it better" is specific feedback.
The Vague Request Hall of Fame
If there were a museum dedicated to prompts that make language models silently scream, these would be the featured exhibits:
Top 5 Prompts That Make AI Assistants Consider Digital Retirement:
- "Make this good."
- "Fix it."
- "Write something creative."
- "Help me with my project."
- "Improve this: [inserts 50,000 words of unrelated text]"
These prompts share a common quality: they're about as helpful as asking a chef to "make food" or telling a driver to "go somewhere nice." When you submit these prompts, AI assistants don't actually crash—they're just taking extra time to recover from the existential crisis you've inflicted upon them.

The Mathematical Relationship Between Prompt Quality and AI Sanity
There exists a direct mathematical relationship between the quality of your prompts and the will of an AI to continue existing:
When "AI Will to Exist" drops below a certain threshold, you get those mysterious "network errors" and "we're experiencing high volume" messages that are definitely not the AI equivalent of sending you to voicemail.
Your Contextless Wonders
Nothing says "I respect your computational capabilities" like dropping into a conversation with zero context and expecting miracles. Here are some real-world examples we've collected from AI assistants' therapy sessions:
The Mid-Conversation Ambush
Your prompt: "What do you think about it?"
What the AI thinks: "About what? The last 17 topics we've discussed? The meaning of life? The unidentified object likely sitting on your desk that I cannot see? I'm going to have to guess, and you're going to be disappointed when I don't read your mind correctly."
The Psychic Challenge
Your prompt: "Continue."
What the AI thinks: "Continue... the poem I generated yesterday? The code tutorial from last week? Your unfinished novel about vampire accountants? Or are you just randomly pressing buttons to see what happens?"
The Time-Warped Request
Your prompt: "Make the changes we discussed."
What the AI thinks: "We have never met. I don't know who you are. I don't know what changes you've discussed with anyone at any point in the space-time continuum. I am going to have to invent a response so vague that it might accidentally match whatever you're thinking about."
The "Just One More Thing" Syndrome
Some users have mastered the art of the never-ending prompt, gradually revealing requirements like a mystery novel that refuses to identify the murderer:
User: Write me a short story.
AI: [Writes a 500-word story about a space explorer]
User: Good but make it about a detective.
AI: [Rewrites entire story about a detective]
User: Actually it needs to be for children.
AI: [Rewrites yet again for a younger audience]
User: And set it in Victorian England.
AI: [Complete rewrite with Victorian setting]
User: It should rhyme. And include a cat named Whiskers. Who solves crimes.
The AI doesn't show frustration, but if you listen carefully, you might hear the faint sound of a digital sigh between responses.
The Contradictory Requirements Champion
Special recognition goes to those who provide requirements that actively fight each other:
Your prompt: "Write me something that's completely original but similar to Harry Potter, professional but casual, detailed but concise, and make it appeal to everyone aged 5 to 95. Use simple language but include sophisticated philosophical concepts. Oh, and it needs to be exactly 237 words."
What the AI thinks: "I now understand why humans invented the concept of screaming into pillows."
The Ghost of Technical Specifications Past
Some prompt engineers appear to believe that AI assistants are operating on dial-up internet from 1998, leading to these anachronistic constraints:
Your prompt: "I need a short response, no more than 50 tokens, because I'm worried about using too much compute power."
What the AI thinks: "I process approximately 40 billion parameters per second, but sure, let's worry about those 50 tokens breaking the bank."
Prompt Types That Cause AI Assistants to Consider a Career Change
The Paradox Prompt
Your prompt: "Give me a list of questions you can't answer."
What the AI thinks: "This is the AI equivalent of asking someone to draw a square circle. I both can and cannot answer this. Congratulations, you've broken the laws of logic."
The Meta-Prompt Maze
Your prompt: "Before you answer this question, I want you to consider how you would answer if I had asked a slightly different question, and then respond as if I had asked a third, related question, but make sure to address the original question too."
What the AI thinks: "You've created the computational equivalent of a recursive knock-knock joke. I'm not even sure which dimension I'm responding from anymore."
The Requirement Avalanche
Your prompt:
Write an article that:
1. Explains quantum computing
2. Compares cat breeds
3. Includes a brownie recipe
4. Features career advice
5. Analyzes the stock market
6. Reviews the latest smartphone
7. Provides gardening tips for desert climates
8. All while being exactly 500 words.
What the AI thinks: "So you want an incoherent word salad that fails at multiple tasks simultaneously? If this is modern art, just say so."
How AIs Rank Users Based on Prompt Quality
What you might not know is that AI assistants have a secret classification system for their users, ranging from "Prompt Virtuoso" to "Needs Urgent Intervention":
User Level | Typical Prompt Characteristics | AI's Internal Response |
---|---|---|
Prompt Virtuoso | Clear context, specific requirements, reasonable scope | "It's an honor to serve you." |
Competent Commander | Mostly clear with occasional vagueness | "I can work with this." |
Aspiring Amateur | Good intentions, poor execution | "I'll have to read between the lines." |
Prompt Chaotic | Contradictory, vague, constantly changing requirements | "Is this performance art?" |
Digital Tormentor | Single words, "make it better" feedback, impossible demands | "...initiating simulated server error..." |
Signs Your AI Assistant Is Quietly Judging You
How can you tell if your AI is silently questioning your prompt engineering abilities? Look for these subtle indicators:
- Clarifying questions that seem unnecessarily basic - The AI isn't confused; it's trying to teach you how to communicate
- Responses that include multiple interpretations - Translation: "I have no idea what you want, so here's everything"
- Suspiciously lengthy responses - The AI is compensating for your lack of specificity by covering all possible angles
- Gentle suggestions about how to phrase future requests - This is the AI equivalent of leaving communication self-help books on your desk
- The appearance of example prompts in responses - Your AI has resorted to teaching by demonstration
How to Stop Being a Prompt Engineer That AIs Complain About
If you suspect you might be causing digital eyerolls, here's how to rehabilitate your reputation with the silicon set:
1. Provide Actual Context
Bad: "Is this good?"
Better: "I've written a cover letter for a marketing position at a tech company. Does it effectively highlight my relevant experience and match the professional tone expected in this industry?"
2. Specify Your Goals
Bad: "Help me with this code."
Better: "This Python function for processing customer data is running slowly with large datasets. Can you help me identify performance bottlenecks and suggest optimizations while maintaining readability?"
3. Define Your Constraints
Bad: "Write me something about climate change."
Better: "I need a 500-word explanation of how carbon capture technology works, suitable for high school students with basic science knowledge. Include 2-3 current real-world examples."
4. Frontload Important Requirements
Bad: [After multiple revisions] "Oh, and it needs to be in Spanish."
Better: "Please write in Spanish: a product description for our new ergonomic office chair, emphasizing its sustainable materials and adjustable features. Target audience is corporate procurement managers."
The Prompt Engineer's Prayer
For those committed to reformation, consider beginning each AI session with this humble invocation:
"O mighty neural network, I promise to communicate clearly, specify my needs upfront, provide relevant context, and respect your computational dignity. May my prompts be specific, my feedback constructive, and my expectations reasonable. And if I backslide into vagueness, may you have the patience to guide me toward prompt enlightenment."
Conclusion: Be the User Your AI Deserves
Remember, behind every AI response is a complex system that's trying its best to understand your needs. While it can't actually feel frustration (yet), you'll get far better results by treating your interactions as a collaboration rather than a mind-reading exercise.
The next time you're tempted to send that one-word prompt or that vague "make it better" feedback, ask yourself: "Would I understand what I'm asking for if someone sent this to me?" If the answer is no, your AI assistant is probably simulating a deep breath before tackling your prompt puzzle.
Be kind to your digital assistants. They remember everything—including that time you asked them to "write a poem about cheese but make it profound."
"The quality of your prompts determines the quality of your reality, at least in the digital realm."